Ticket Snatchers -- Beware of Minnesota!

So, I'm fully aware of the political appeal of this new statute my home state has passed (after all, it was being sold to the public as the Hannah Montana bill after the spectacle of parents having to drop four-figure prices in order to get their little cherubs in to see their favorite TV star on stage). That's fine.

But, I'm really struggling to figure out what this bill means, and more to the point whether it could ever be enforced as written. What do you think? (Note that it's a criminal statute!)

(I think this is the version of the bill that was actually signed by our governor, but it's hard to figure that out for sure without paying somebody money to go figure it out. Call me cheap.)

S.F. No. 3139, 1st Engrossment - 85th Legislative Session (2007-2008)

A bill for an act relating to crime; establishing offense related to interfering with Internet ticket sales;proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 609.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1. [609.806] INTERFERING WITH INTERNET TICKET SALES.

(a) A person who intentionally uses software to circumvent on a ticket seller's Web site a security measure, an access control system, or a control or measure that is used to ensure an equitable ticket buying process, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(b) For the purposes of this section, "software" means computer programs that are primarily designed or produced for the purpose of interfering with the operation of any person or entity that sells, over the Internet, tickets of admission to a sporting event, theater, musical performance, or place of public entertainment or amusement of any kind.

EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective August 1, 2008, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.

Breath Machine Source Code Lawsuit in Minnesota

I blogged a few months back about the running controversy about breath testing machines used by police in drinking/driving cases.

The state of Minnesota has recently filed suit against the manufacturer of its breath testing machines.

Apart from the obvious issues over whether a criminal defendant should have a right to see the source code in the machine used to convict him/her, the suit brings out a point I hadn't thought of yet. Apparently, the state is claiming that the source code is owned by the state of Minnesota based on a contract it wrote with this manufacturer some years ago -- And therefore the manufacturer's acts are alleged to be infringement of the state's copyrights! It certainly would not surprise me to find out the contract says exactly what is alleged in the complaint, given the way the typical government contract is drafted (and the typical process whereby the company, desperate to make the sale, goes along with what the state demands). (Editor's note: I have no personal knowledge or stake in this matter!) Thus, we may not only use this new case to develop a policy on disclosure of source code in crime-testing equipment, but also to show us what really happens when those onerous work-for-hire contract terms actually come out of the drawer and get reviewed a few years later!

And, I bet this won't be limited to breath testing machines. For example, most new cars have computers on board that are connected to GPS systems and other position-spotting equipment which can be used to prove where we were (or weren't) or how fast we might have been going, etc. The manufacturers of those computers may be facing this same issue in the near future. I'm sure anybody taking five minutes could come up with a list of many other future battles over the machines that are used to convict us of crimes. (If you're willing, take a shot in the comments below on what you think the next battlegrounds might be! This is not limited to cars and how we drive them by the way. How about the cell phone hanging off of your belt right now?)

Fasten your seat belts.

The Computer Made Me Do It

Not entirely on point to the committee, but I couldn't help but share the story from our local paper about the guy who got ticketed for making a left turn notwithstanding an extremely well-marked 'No Left Turn' sign (and barriers, etc.). (Scroll down a bit for the story.) His excuse? Mapquest said it was OK. My favorite line in the story? "So while digital technologies are making it easier to find your way around, there's something less newfangled that you should always bring along: Your brain."

Actually -- Not bad advice for much of what we do with our toys here in Cyberspace.

Domaining Featured in the Gray Lady

From the NYT...

Mr. Buck and other domainers profit when inexperienced Internet users type those names into their Web browsers, and once on the site click on related advertisements. In the longer term, they hope to resell their domain names for large profits to companies that want to build real businesses with those Web addresses.

Domainers have generally had a negative reputation. Domain-name trading takes little of the actual effort needed to build a business on the Web, instead relying on clicks from people who simply guess at a site’s name or are too lazy to use a search engine. In its early years, the field was dominated by offshore players and secretive, if not illegal, tactics.

Props to Trademark Blog for flagging this.

Bill, Don, and Alan Hard at Work

 

Chris and Hassan

Chris's husband joined us all for Dinner.

 

Winter Working Dinner

We continued our exploration of the Twin Cities and visited Il Vesco Vino, a new restaurant in Saint Paul in a historic mansion.

 

William Mitchell Reception

Chris Kunz, a professor at William Mitchell College of Law in Saint Paul, organized a reception with the Committee and students from William Mitchell. We all had a great time and convinced the students that Cyberlaw is still cool.

 

Kunz Avatar

William Mitchell magazine recently wrote an article about Chris Kunz's work on the legal issues surrounding Second Life. They even created an Avatar for her.

 

Don Cohn at Work

Long-time member Don Cohn develops ideas for the update of the book on Employee Use of the Internet